Physical quality of coffee bean (Coffea arabica L.) as affected by harvesting and drying methods

Authors

  • Kinde Lamessa Tesgera Wollega university, Shambu campus Author
  • B.C. Nandeshwar Department of Plant Sciences, Faculty of Agriculture, Shambu Campus, Wollega University Author
  • Zerihun Jalata Department of Plant Sciences, Faculty of Agriculture, Shambu Campus, Wollega University Author
  • Teferi Chala2 Bega District Agricultural Office, Coffee and Spices Expert, West Wollega, Ethiopia Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24154/jhs.v16i2.1182

Keywords:

Coffee bean size, drying surface, ethiopia, export, harvesting methods, physical quality

Abstract

Coffee is a stimulant crop with high socio-economic cultural value including economical significance in Ethiopia. This study was conducted in 2019-2020 to investigate the effect of harvesting methods and drying surfaces on the physical quality of the coffee beans. The experiment was carried out with two factors, harvesting methods and drying surfaces laid out in a two factorial completely randomized block design with three replications using a landrace coffee variety. The result showed that the interaction of harvesting methods and drying surfaces was highly significant (P<0.01) for coffee bean size and dried coffee berry weight. The highest beans retained above screen were recorded from the interaction of mesh wire (90%) and cemented drying (89%) surfaces with selective harvesting methods. The highest dried coffee berry weight (69.33 gm) were attained from the interaction of selective harvesting with mesh wire drying surfaces. The lowest dried coffee berry weight (63.79 gm) were attained from the interaction of strip harvesting with tin drying surfaces. Significant (P<0.05) variation for primary defects, length of drying period were recorded. Higher length of drying periods (41.67 days) was recorded from the interaction of mesh wire drying surfaces with selective harvesting method and the lowest (20.33 days) was recorded from the interaction of tin drying surfaces with strip harvesting method. The highest percentage of primary defected beans were recorded from the interaction of selective harvesting methods with mesh wire drying surfaces (15%) and the lowest number were recorded from strip harvesting method with drying on plastic (5%). Therefore, it can be concluded that using the interaction of selective harvesting and drying on mesh wire is better for optimum physical quality of coffee in the studied area

References

Anteneh, T. 2011. Farm productivity and value chain analysis of coffee in Daro Lebu district, west Hararghe Zone of Oromia Regional State. M.Sc. Thesis presented to School of Graduate Studies of Haramaya University, Haramaya, Ethiopia. p.84

Asfaw, T. 2018. Evaluating the quality of coffee product on marketing performance of Ethiopian ommodity Exchange (ECX) Hawassa branch. International Journal of Social Sciences Perspectives. 2(1): 50-79. DOI: 10.33094/7.2017.2018.21.50.79

Barel, M., Jacquet, M. 1994. Coffee quality: its causes, appreciation and improvement. Plant Research Development, 1: 5-13

Bee S., Brando CHJ, Brumen G, Carvalhaes N, Kolling-Speer I , Speer K, Suggi Liverani F, Texeira, AA, Thomaziello RA, Viani R, Vitzhum OG (2005). The Raw Bean. I n: Illy and Vianni (eds.) , Espresso Coffee The science of quality 2nd Edition. London, UK. Elsevier Academic Press, p. 87-178.

Belete, Y. 2014. Physical quality of Arabica coffee bean genotypes. In: Coffee Production, Variety and Trading ways to maximize Ethiopia’s benefits, pp. 108–125. Girma A., Wube T,(eds.), Proceedings of 24thannual conference of

the biological society of Ethiopia,

Berhanu, W. Ali, M., Essubalew, G. 2014. Impact of sun drying methods and layer thickness on the quality of highland Arabica Coffee varieties at Limmu, South Western Ethiopia. J. Horticulture 1: 117. Doi:10.4172/2376-0354.1000117.

Berhanu, T. 2017. Ethiopian coffee sector strategy and future prospects, Coffee Tea and Spices Extension Director, ECTDMA, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.

Boot, W.J. 2006. Coffee Processing Handbook: from the cherry to the green bean post harvesting coffee processing. Baarn, the Netherlands. pp. 173-192.

Boot, W.J. 2011. Ethiopian Coffee Buying Manual: Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Practical Guidelines for Purchasing and Importing Ethiopian Specialty Coffee Beans. USAI D’s Agribusiness and Trade Expansion Program. p.90

Chauhan, R., Hooda, M.S., Tanga, A.A. 2015. Coffee: The backbone of Ethiopian economy, A review. International Journal of Economic Plants, 2(1):018-022,

Clifford, M.N. 1985. Chemical and physical aspects of green coffee and coffee products. In: Clifford MN, Willson KC(Eds.), Coffee botany, biochemistry, and production of beans and beverage. Croom Helm, London, pp. 305-374.

CSA (Central Statistical Agency). 2020. Agricultural Sample Survey, 2019/20 (2012E.C). Volume I: Report on area and production of major crops (Private peasant holdings, Meher season), Statistical Bulletin 587, Addis Ababa, 133 p.

Davids, K. 2001. Processing: Flavor and processing method in coffee review. p.1-4.

Desse, N. 2008. Mapping Quality profiles of Ethiopian Coffee by Origin. In:. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: Girma A, Bayetta B, Tesfaye S, Endale T, Taye K (eds). Coffee Diversity and Knowledge, Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research ,development. UNCTAD CNUCED, WTO OMC. Geneva. p.317-327

ECX (Ethiopia Commodity Exchange) (2010). ECX Coffee contracts. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.

Endale, T., Behailu, W., Bayetta, B., Fabrice, D. 2008. Effects of genotypes and fruit maturity stage on caffeine and other biochemical constituents of arabica coffee. In: Proceedings of a National Work Shop Four Decades of Coffee Research and Development in Ethiopia, 14-17 August 2007, EI AR, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. pp. 169-172

FAO. 2006. Statistical Year book; Panama Profile. FAO, Rome.

FAO. 2010. Introduction to Coffee Drying. ‘Good hygiene practices in the primary production of coffee. http://www.ico.org/projects/Good-Hygiene-Practices/

Getachew, E., Berhanu, T., Ali, M., Tesfaye, S., Yehenew, G. 2015. Influence of sun drying methods and layer thickness on quality of midland arabica coffee varieties at Gomma-II, Southe West Ethiopia. Glob. J. Agric. Sci. 3(2):203-212.

Getu, B. 2009. Genotype x environment interaction of Arabica coffee (Coffea arabica L.) for bean biochemical composition and organoleptic quality characteristics. M.Sc. Thesis presented to School of Graduate Studies of Haramaya University, Haramaya, Ethiopia. P 124.

Gomez, K.A., Gomez, A.A. 1984. Statistical procedures for agricultural research 2nd ed, JSohn Willy and Sons. Inc., New York.

Hicks, P.A. 2002. Postharvest processing and Quality Assurance for Specialty/Organic Coffee Products. FAO Regional Office for Asia and the Pacific, Bangkok, Thailand.

ICO (International Coffee Organization) 2015. Total Production by exporting countries

ITC (International Trade Center) 2011. Ethiopian Coffee Quality Improvement Project. Aid for Trade Global Review: Case Story. Geneva Switzerland. Available online at: http:// www.intracen.org.

Killeen, J.T., Harper, G. 2016. Coffee in the 21st century. Will Climate Change and Increased Demand Lead to New Deforestation? . Conservation International, New York

Martin, S., Donzeles, S., Silva, M.L., Zanatta, J.N. and Cecon, P.R. 2009. Qualidade do café cereja descascado submetido a secagem continua eintermitente,em secador de camada fixa. Revista Brasileira de Armazenamento, Viçosa, Especial Café, p.30-36.

Mazzafera, P., Padilha-Purcino, R. 2004. Postharvest processing methods and alterations in coffee fruit. In: ASIC proceedings of 20thcolloquia coffee. Bangalore, India.

Mekonen, H. 2009. Influence of genotype, location and processing methods on the quality of coffee (Coffea arabica L.). M.Sc. Thesis presented to School of Graduate Studies of Hawassa University, Hawassa, and Ethiopia.105.

Mohammed-Sani, A., Wassu, M., Tesfaye, S. .2017. Evaluation of harvesting and postharvest processing method on raw quality attributes of green Arabica Coffee beans produced in Hararghe, eastern Ethiopia. International Journal of Plant Breeding and Crop Science, 4(2): 187-196.

Negussie, M., Mitiku M, Agwada C(2009). Does Acquisition of Information and Knowledge Suffice? Lesson in Improving Coffee Quality through an innovative and integrated approach in Ethiopia. CABI Africa, Addis Ababa. pp:

-1241.

Olamcam, (2008). Report on Sustainability of Arabica coffee in the North West Region of Cameroon. An export coffee organization part of Olam International Agri Business, Singapore.

Pimenta-José C, Angélico, C.L., Chalfoun, S.M. 2018. Challengs in coffee quality: Cultural, chemical and microbiological aspects. Ciência e Agrotecnologia, 42(4):337-349,

Petit, S., Klevens, R.M., Morrison, M.A., Nadle, J., Gershman, K., Ray, S., Townes, J.M. 2007. Invasive methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections in the United States. Jama, 298(15), 1763-1771.

SAS. 2004. Statistical Analysis Software version 9.0, SAS Institute Inc. Cary, NC, USA.

Steiger, D.L., Nagai, C., Moore, P.H., Morden, C.W., Osgood, R.V., Ming, R. 2002. AFLP analysis of genetic diversity within and among Coffea arabica cultivars. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 105(2-3): 209-215.

Subedi RN (2010) .Comparative analysis of dry and wet processing of coffee with respect to quality in Kavre District, Nepal. M.Sc. Thesis submitted to Wagengen University. The Netherlands 43-51.

Tesfaye, K. 2006. Genetic Diversity of wild Coffea arabica populations in Ethiopia as a contribution to conservation and use planning ecology and development Series, 44.

Vaast, P., Bertrand, B., Perriot, J.J., Guyot, B., Génard, M. 2006. Fruit thinning and shade influence bean characteristics and beverage quality of C. arabica optimal conditions. J. Sci. Food. Agric. 86:197-204.

Wintegens, J.N. 2004. Coffee: Growing, processing, sustainable production, a guide book for growers, processors, traders, and researchers, WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH and Co. KGaA, Weinheium.

Yigzaw, D. 2014. Assessment of genetic diversity of Ethiopian Arabica coffee genotypes using morphological, biochemical and molecular markers. PhD Dissertation, University of the free state, Bloemfontein, South Africa.

Downloads

Published

31-12-2021

Issue

Section

Original Research Papers

How to Cite

Lamessa Tesgera, K., Nandeshwar, B. ., Jalata, Z. ., & Chala , T. C. (2021). Physical quality of coffee bean (Coffea arabica L.) as affected by harvesting and drying methods. Journal of Horticultural Sciences, 16(2), 292-300. https://doi.org/10.24154/jhs.v16i2.1182

Similar Articles

171-180 of 332

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.