Sweet cherry cultivars influenced the growth and productivity under HDP
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24154/jhs.v14i1.694Keywords:
Sweet cherry, Prunus avium, high density planting, TCSA, quality attributes, yield efficiencyAbstract
In a field experiment, to identify the best sweet cherry varieties for high density orcharding, maximum canopy volume (18.94 cm3) was recorded in variety ‘Steela’ and minimum in ‘Lambert’ while, ‘Bigarreau Napoleon’ had maximum TCSA (213 cm2). Trees grown under HDP have lower TCSA in comparison to normal density. Primary and secondary branch girth were maximum in ‘Bigarreau Napoleon’ whereas, annual extension growth and shoot thickness were high in ‘Steela’. Yield, yield efficiency and cumulative yield efficiency were registered maximum in ‘Bigarreau Napoleon’ and ‘Bigarreau Noir Grossa’ cultivars. Largest fruit weight, fruit length and fruit diameter were found maximum (10.16 g/fruit), (25.51 mm) (25.20 mm) respectively in ‘Bigarreau Napoleon’. Total soluble solids were found maximum in ‘Bigarreau Noir Grossa’ (17.30 0Brix) among the studied cultivars. Correlation matrix showed that TCSA had positive correlation with canopy volume, primary branch girth and secondary branch girth and fruit weight showed positive correlation with fruit length and fruit diameter.
References
Aglar E, Yildiz K and long L E. 2016. The effect of root stocks and training system on the early performance of ‘0900 Ziraat’ sweet cherry. Notulae Botanicae Horti Agrobotanici Cluj- Napoca. 44 (2):573-578.
Anonymous. 2016-17. District wise estimated area production of major horticultural crops. Department of Horticulture, J&K, Srinagar India. pp 1-2.
Anonymous. 2014. FAOSTAT, Stastics Division retrieved 12th Sep 2017 from http//www.fao.org.
Blazkova, J., and Hlusickova, I., 2007. Results of an orchard trial with new clonal sweet cherry rootstocks established at Holovousny and evaluated in the stage of full cropping. Hortic. Sci., 2:54-64
Cantin Celia, J.P., Pinochet J., Gogorcena Y., Moreno, M. A. 2010. Growth, yield and fruit quality of Van and Stark Hardy Giant sweet cherry cultivars as influenced by grafting on different root stocks. Scientia Hort., 123: 329-335.
Fioravanço J C , Czermainski A. B. C. and de Oliveira P. R .D. 2016. Yield efficiency for nine apple cultivars grafted on two rootstocks. Ciência Rural, 46(10): 1701-1706.
Guglielmo Costa, Emilio, Beltrame, Zerbinipaola eccher and Pianezzola, Alberto. 1997. High planted apple orchard effect on yield performance and fruit quality. Acta Hort. 451:505-508.
Kappel K., Fisher-Fleming, B, Hoghe E. 1996. Fruit characteristics and sensory attributes of an ideal sweet cherry. Hort Sci. 31:443-446.
Lanauskas J., Uselis N., Kviklys, D., Kvikliene N. and Buskiene L. 2012. Rootstock effect on the performance of sweet cherry cv. Lapins. Hort. Sci., 39:55-60
Manolova V and Kolev K, 2013. Economics results from growing cherry in different level of intensification. Acta Hort. 981:719-723.
Milosevic Tomo, Milosevic Nebojsa, Milivojevic Jelena, Glisic Ivan and Nikolic Radmila. 2014. Experience with Mazzard and Colt sweet cherry rootstocks in Serbia which are used for high density planting system under heavy and acidic conditions. Sci. Hort.. 176: 261-270.
Moreno, M.A., Adrada, R., Aparicio, J., Betran, J.A. 2001. Performance of Sunburst cherry grafted on different rootstocks. J. Hortic. Sci. Biotechnol., 76:167-173.
Jackson, J.E. 1989. World-wide development of high density planting in research and practice. Acta Hort. 243: 17-28
Musacchi S, Gagliardi F, Serra S. 2015. New training systems for high density planting of sweet cherry. Horticultural Sci.. 50: 59-67.
Radunic M, Jazbec A, Pecina M, Cosic T and Pavicic N. 2011. Growth and yield of the sweet cherry (Prunus avium L) as affected by training system. African J. Bot. 10 (24): 4901- 4906.
Sansavini S, LugliS, Grandi M, Gaddoni M,Correale R(2001). Impianto ad altadensita di ciliegi llevati a V: confronto fra portinesti nanizzanti. Rivista di frutticoltura N.3:63-73
Srivastava K.K., Singh D.B., Kumar Dinesh, Singh S R, Sharma O C and Lal S. 2017. Effect of planting densities and varieties on yield and yield associated characters of apple (Malus domestica) on semi-dwarfing rootstock. Indian J. Agri. Sci. 87(5):593-6.
Szot I and Meland M.2001 . Influence of root stock on size distribution and fruit quality of sweet cherry cultivars. Int. Agrophysics. 15: 207- 214.
Wertheim, S. J., Wagenmaker, P. S., Bootsma, J. H., Groot, M. J. 2001. Orchard system for apple and pear: condition for success. Acta Hort., 557: 209-227
Westwood M N and Roberts A N. 1970. The relationship between trunk cross sectional area and weight of apple tree. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 95:28-30.
Whiting MD, Lang G. and Ophardt, D. 2005. Rootstock and training system affect sweet cherry growth, yield and fruit quality. Hort Sci., 40 (3): 582-586
Zekri M. 2000. Citrus rootstocks affect scion nutrition, fruit quality, growth, yield and economical return. Fruits, 55: 231–239.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2019 K K Srivastava, Dinesh Kumar, P Barman (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright. Articles published are made available as open access articles, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. 
This journal permits and encourages authors to share their submitted versions (preprints), accepted versions (postprints) and/or published versions (publisher versions) freely under the CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 license while providing bibliographic details that credit, if applicable.
How to Cite
. 
