Berry Weight, Quality and Cane Biochemistry Changes in Relation to Cane Thickness of Own-Rooted and Grafted 'Tas-A-Ganesh' Grape

Authors

  • R G Somkuwar Author
  • J Satisha Author
  • S D Ramteke Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24154/jhs.v8i1.330

Keywords:

Tas-A-Ganesh, Sprouting, Cane Thickness, Bunch Weight, Total Soluble Solids, Reducing Sugars, Carbohydrates

Abstract

A field trial was conducted to determine the effect of cane thickness on berry quality and other biochemical parameters in 'Tas-A-Ganesh' grape at National Research Centre for Grapes, Pune, during the year 2008- 2009. Average bunch weight increased with increase in cane diameter. Own-rooted vines of cane thickness <6mm sprouted earlier than thicker canes. TSS of berries decreased with increase in berry size. Berries on grafted vines recorded lower TSS than on own-rooted vines. Biochemical parameters such as content of reducing sugars, carbohydrat and phenols were higher in grafted vines of cane thickness >10mm. Results indicate that thicker canes either on their own roots or on grafted vines are superior for yield and yield components, as also for physical properties of bunches and berries and total carbohydrate content of the canes.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Anonymous. 2012. Grapes. In: Indian Horticulture Database 2011. Kumar, B., Mistry, N.C., Singh, B. and Gandhi, C.P. (Eds), National Horticulture Board, Gurgaon, India, pp. 68-75

Cawthon, D.L. and Morris, J.R. 1977. Yield and quality of ‘Concord’ grapes as affected by pruning severity, nodes per bearing unit, training system, shoot positioning and sampling date in Arkansas. J. Amer. Soc. Hortl. Sci., 102:760-767

Dry, P.R., Iland, P.G. and Ristic, R. 2004. What is Vine Balance? Proceedings of 12 th Australian Wine Industry Technical Conference, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia, pp. 68-74

Ferree, D.C., Cahoon, G.A., Ellis, M.A., Scurlock, D.M. and Johns, G.R. 1996. Influence of eight rootstocks on the performance of ‘White Riesling’ and ‘Cabernet Franc’ over five years. Fruit Varieties J., 50:124-130

Gladstones, J. 1992. Viticulture and Environment. Winetitles. Adelaide, South Australia

Gotez, G., Fkyerat, A., Metais, N., Kunz, M., Tabacchi, R., Pezet, R. and Pont, V. 1999. Resistance factors to grey mould in grape berries: Identification of some phenolics inhibitors of Botrytis cinerea stilbene oxidase. Phytochem., 52:759–767

Hedberg, P.R., McLeod, R., Cullis, B. and Freeman, B.M. 1986. Effect of rootstock on the production, grape and wine quality of Shiraz vines in the Murrumbidgee Irrigation Area. Australian J. Exptl. Agri., 26:511-516

Jackson, D.I. and Lombard, P.B. 1993. Environmental and management practices affecting grape composition and wine quality – A review. Amer. J. Enol. Viticult., 44:409-430

Kingston-Smith, A.H. 2001. Resource allocation. Trends in Plant Sci., 6:48-49

May, P., Clingeleffer, P.R. and Brien, C.J. 1976. Sultana (Vitis vinifera L.) canes and their exposure to light. Vitis, 14:278-288

Pool, R.M. 1982. Effect of mepiquat chloride on the growth and yield of Concord grapevines. J. Amer. Soc. Hortl. Sci., 107:376-380

Prakash, G.S. and Reddy, N.N. 1990. Effect of different rootstocks on bud-break in grape cv. Anab-e-Shahi. Crop Res., 3:51-55

Reynolds, A.G. and Wardle, D.A. 2001. Rootstocks impact vine performance and fruit composition of grapes in British Columbia. Hort. Technol., 11:419-427

Richards, D. 1983. The grape root system. Hort. Rev., 5:127-168

Rizk-Alla, M.S., Sabry, G.H. and Abd El-Wahab, M.A. 2011. Influence of some rootstocks on the performance of Red globe grape cultivar. J. Amer. Sci., 7:71-81

Satisha, J., Somkuwar, R.G, Sharma, J., Upadhyay, A.K. and Adsule, P.G. 2010. Influence of rootstocks on growth yield and fruit composition of Thompson Seedless grapes grown in the Pune region of India. South African J. Enol. Viticult., 31:1-8

Scholefield, N., May, P. and Neales T.F. 1977. Harvest- pruning and trellising of ‘Sultana’ vines: I. Effects on yield and vegetative growth. Scientia Hort., 115-122

Shaulis, N. 1980. Responses of grapevines and grapes to spacing of and within canopies. Proc. UCD Grape and Wine Symp., pp. 353-361

Tafazoh, E. 1977. Cane and bud number effect on yield components of non-irrigated grape cv. ‘Yaghooti’. Scientia Hort., 7:133-136

Verma, S.K., Singh, S.K. and Hare Krishna. 2010. The effect of certain rootstocks on the grape cultivar ‘Pusa Urvashi’ (Vitis vinifera L.) Int’l. J. Fr. Sci., 10:16–28

Vidhyasekaran, P. 1973. Possible role of ortho-dihyroxy phenolics in grapevine anthracnose disease resistance. Indian J. Exptl. Biol., 11:473–475

Downloads

Published

30-06-2013

Issue

Section

Original Research Papers

How to Cite

Somkuwar, R. G., Satisha, J., & Ramteke, S. D. (2013). Berry Weight, Quality and Cane Biochemistry Changes in Relation to Cane Thickness of Own-Rooted and Grafted ’Tas-A-Ganesh’ Grape. Journal of Horticultural Sciences, 8(1), 30-34. https://doi.org/10.24154/jhs.v8i1.330

Similar Articles

1-10 of 344

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.