Performance of Apple ber on different training systems in hot arid condition


  • Prashant Nikumbhe ICAR-National Research Centre for Grapes, Pune - 412307, Maharashtra, India Author
  • P R Meghwal ICAR-Central Arid Zone Research Institute, Jodhpur - 342003, Rajasthan, India Author
  • Om Prakash Meena ICAR-Central Arid Zone Research Institute, Jodhpur - 342003, Rajasthan, India Author
  • Pramendra ICAR-Central Arid Zone Research Institute, Jodhpur - 342003, Rajasthan, India Author
  • Hari Mohan Meena ICAR-Central Arid Zone Research Institute, Jodhpur - 342003, Rajasthan, India Author



Ber, fruit quality, PAR, training system, yield


Ber is an indigenous and common fruit of India. It is commercially grown under wide climatic and soil conditions. Apple ber (Zizyphus jujube Mill) cultivar is gaining momentum in sub-tropical and tropical climatic conditions of West Bengal, Telangana, Andhra Pradesh, Maharashtra, Rajasthan, Gujarat and in several northern parts of India. It is precocious in bearing habit with bold and crispy fruits. Many factors including training practices affect vegetative and fruit quality parameters. Due to bolder and heavier fruits, the cultivar is prone for limbs breakage or complete tilting of plants which results in uneven fruiting, reduced fruit set, and higher fruit drop. Considering its appealing fruit taste and quality and to address the above mentioned issues, different training systems were evaluated to see its performance on three to four years old apple ber orchards. Plants were trained on different training systems viz. Y-Shape, Espalier training system and control. Observations were recorded on vegetative and fruit quality parameters. Training systems significantly influenced various vegetative, yield and fruit quality parameters. Vegetative parameters such as leaf area, physical and quality attributes viz., fruit weight and size, TSS, ascorbic acid, yield, and B: C ratio were better in Y-Shape training system. Hence, Y- Shape training system can be adopted to improve yield and fruit quality parameters in Apple ber.


Download data is not yet available.


Abrosca, B. D., Scognamiglio, M., Corrado, L., Chiocchio, I., Zampella, L., Mastrobuoni, F., Rega, P., Scortichini, M., Fiorentino, A. and Petriccione, M. 2017. Evaluation of different training systems on Annurca apple fruits revealed by agronomical, qualitative and NMR- based metabolomic approaches. Food Chem., 222: 18-27. DOI:

Azam-Ali S., Bonkoungou, E., Bowe, C., DeKok, C., Godara, A. and Williams, J. T. 2006. Ber and other jujubes. In: Fruits for the future 2. International Centre for Underutilized Crops, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO171BJ, UK, 18-29.

Caruso, T., Di Vaio, C., Inglese, P. and Pace, L.S. (1998). Crop load and fruit quality distribution within canopy of ‘Spring Lady’ peach trees trained to ‘Central leader’ and ‘Y shape’. Acta Hortic., 465: 621-628. DOI:

Gill, P.P.S., Dhillon, W.S. and Singh, N. P. 2011. Influence of training systems on growth, yield and fruit quality of pomegranate ‘Kandhari’. Acta Hortic., 890: 305-310. DOI:

Hedge, J.E. and Hofreiter, B.T. 1962. In: Methods in Carbohydrate Chemistry. Vol.17, (Eds.,) Whistler, R.L. and BeMiller, J.N., Academic Press, New York, p. 420.

Kalkan, N.N., Karadogan, B., Kadioðlu, Z., Esmek, Ý., Albayrak, S. and Kaya, O. 2022. Response of karaerik grape cultivar (Vitis vinifera L.) to two training systems and three trunk heights. Erwerbs-Obstbau, pp. 1-9. DOI:

Mathangi S. and Maran, J.P. 2020. A study on Apple ber to identify the suitability of new product development. Plant Sci., 7(1): 61-69. DOI:

Obeed, R. S., Harhash, M. M. and Abdel-Mawgood A. L. 2008. Fruit properties and genetic diversity of five ber (Ziziphus mauritiana Lam.) cultivars. Pak. J. Biol. Sci., 11(6): 888-893. DOI:

Palliotti, A. 2012. A new closing Y shaped training system for grapevines. Australian J. Grape Wine Res., 18(1): 57-63. DOI:

Panse, V.G. and Sukhatme P.V. 1995. Statistical method of agricultural workers. ICAR Publication, New Delhi.

Reynolds, A. G. and Vanden Heuvel, J. E. 2009. Influence of grapevine training systems on vine growth and fruit composition: A Review. Am. J. Enol. Vitic., 60(3): 251-268. DOI:

Sansavini, S. and Corelli, L. 1997. Yield and light efficiency for high quality fruit in apple and peach high-density planting. Acta Hortic., 451: 559-568. DOI:

Singh, C. and Bal, J.S. 2006. Effect of nutrients and growth regulator on fruit drop, size and yield of ber (Zizyphus mauritiana Lamk.). Int. J. Agric. Plant Sci., 2(2): 358-360.

Yin, Y., Li, M., Jia, N., Sun, Y., Han, B., Liu, C., Liu, S., Zhao, S. and Guo, Z. 2022. Effects of trellis system and berry thinning intensity on vine performance and quality composition of two table grape cultivars under protected cultivation in northern China. Scientia Hortic., 299: 111045. DOI:






Original Research Papers

How to Cite

Nikumbhe, P., Meghwal, P. R., Meena, O. P., Pramendra, & Meena, H. M. (2023). Performance of Apple ber on different training systems in hot arid condition. Journal of Horticultural Sciences, 18(1), 35-39.

Similar Articles

1-10 of 514

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.